Which is correct?

Emre25Which is correct?- Would you still you love me if I were to cheat on you?- Would you still love me if I would cheat on you?

Only the first is correct.

Emre25I just basically want to know when I should use were to and when would.

The if-clause has were to. The other clause has would.

Wh

I think both are okay.

Anonymous I think both are okay.

CalifJimThe if-clause has were to. The other clause has would.What would you do if you were to win a million dollars?You can learn these word groups as units - as if they were fixed phrases:If I were to; If you were to; If he were to; If she were to; If we were to; If they were toCJ

Thanks!

Could you give me an example of when to use would

Emre25Could you give me an example of when to use would

You mean in an if-clause? Virtually never unless it's in an indirect question like this:

I wanted to know if he would be willing to take us to the supermarket while our car is at the shop being repaired.

CJ

I can imagine a more convoluted version of the original sentence (with a slightly altered meaning) -- "Would you still love me if I were the kind of person who would cheat on you?" (It's even more hypothetical than the original "Would you still love me if I were to cheat on you?"))

khoffI can imagine a more convoluted version of the original sentence (with a slightly altered meaning) -- "Would you still love me if I were the kind of person who would cheat on you?" (It's even more hypothetical than the original "Would you still love me if I were to cheat on you?"))

Thanks for your answer. So would this sound weird/odd for a native speaker

ACTUALLY WOULD YOU STILL LOVE ME IF I WOULD CHEAT ON YOU?--------IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT
WOULD YOU STILL LOVE ME IF I CHEAT ON YOU?----------------IS CORRECT-----------------BECAUSE YOU CAN'T USE "WOULD" TWICE IN THAT SENTENCE. -------------------------------WITH "WOULD" IN THE FIRST PART OF THE SENTENCE,WE USE THE FIRST FORM OF THE VERB "CHEAT".
HOPE IT HELPS.

Thank you!!