0
Rommel Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

which is

Should I omit the expression ‘which is’ in the following sentence to make it shorter?

To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language which is not too difficult to understand.
  

Top answer

No, if you do that the sentence will become ungrammatical: * To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language not too difficult to understand. You must link the AdjP "not too difficult to understand" to the NP it's modifying. To do that requires a relative clause using the relative pronoun "which" (or the subordinator "that") as the relativised word linked to the NP antecedent "English language": To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language [which/that is not too difficult to understand ] .

  • No, if you do that the sentence will become ungrammatical: * To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language not too difficult to understand.
  • You must link the AdjP "not too difficult to understand" to the NP it's modifying.
  • To do that requires a relative clause using the relative pronoun "which" (or the subordinator "that") as the relativised word linked to the NP antecedent "English language": To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language [which/that is not too difficult to understand ] .
  • BillJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
No, if you do that the sentence will become ungrammatical:

*To identify themselves as American citizens, they must use the English language not too difficult to understand.

You must link the AdjP "not too difficult to understand" to the NP it's modifying. To do that requires a relative clause using the relative pronoun "which" (or the subordinator "that") as the relativis

Related Questions