0
Taka Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

Which interpretation?

The sentence:
We know little more about the Mayans than that they were agricultural, and that they devoted most of their spare time to a religion that focused on astronomy, and a complicated and accurate calender.


About " a complicated and accurate calender", which interpretation is correct?

(a )... than that [they were agricultural] , and [that they devoted most of their spare time to a religion that focused on astronomy] , and [ a complicated and accurate calender] .

(i.e What we do know about Mayans are 3 things)

or

(b )... that they devoted most of their spare time to [a religion that focused on astronomy] , and [a complicated and accurate calender] .

(i.e Mayans deveoted their spare time to 2 things)

I think it's (a ) ,but my book says it's (b )...
  

Top answer

) that they devoted their spare time to two things: a religion and a calendar. This is true. ( II ) We know two things about them: (1) they were farmers, and (2) they devoted their spare time to 2 things, a religion and a calendar.

  • ) that they devoted their spare time to two things: a religion and a calendar.
  • This is true.
  • ( II ) We know two things about them: (1) they were farmers, and (2) they devoted their spare time to 2 things, a religion and a calendar.
  • ( III ) Of course, we really know 3 things about them: (1) they were farmers, (2) they devoted part of their spare time to religion, and (3) they devoted part of their spare time to devising a calendar.
  • Grammatically, (I), (II) and (III) are all true.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
( I ) Your book says (?) that they devoted their spare time to two things: a religion and a calendar. This is true.

( II ) We know two things about them: (1) they were farmers, and (2) they devoted their spare time to 2 things, a religion and a calendar.

( III ) Of course, we really know 3 things about them: (1) they were farmers, (2) they devoted part of their spare tim
0
Let me ask one more. Is it 100% gramatically wrong to juxtapose noun clauses, such as that-clauses, and simple nouns in the same sentence?
0
Hard for me to picture, actually, but I think I see what you mean-- there seems to be a 'to' forgotten: 'and to a complicated...'

Does that help, or is it time for me to go to bed?

0
If there were "to" in front of "a complicated", things whould be so much clear that I wouldn't be confused. But actually, there is not.

Anyway, thak you, Mister!
0
I know, but I think that there should be, grammatico-structurally-- precisely because of that comma after 'astronomy'.

Oh well.

Related Questions