Which IELTS band would my essay get?

Nowadays a number of people in the United Kingdom totally disagree that the government supports museums and galleries and spends huge sums of money. They say that it is too much for culture and the country has other difficulties such as environmental pollution, overcrowding and salaries.

I understand why people disagree with the government's decision, but I totally agree. First of all, subsidising the visual and performing arts really supports the economy of the country because it attracts many people to visit the United Kingdom. In the end they bring more money than the government invested into this project. Secondly, one it keeps history. From my point of view, it is more important than money, because without memories about the past the United Kingdom will lose its individuality.

On the one hand, spending too much money on arts can't be a perfect solution. On the other hand, if authorities give money to support the other structures, for example ,education, environment ,social programs, it is not a problem. It means that culture is really important for the United Kingdom’s government. Although I have never been there and when I see news on TV or watch videos on the internet I immediately understand where museums and galleries are situated.

I am completely sure, if I came to the United Kingdom I would come first go to see the cultural attractions. It is the best way to get to know local traditions. And I hope that the government and people who live there will find a wise solution in any situation.