Where the party struggled
Where the party struggled was in working-class areas.
I see Where the party struggled as a subject (function) and a noun phrase (form) in the sentence above.
Is my parsing correct?
Top answer
Where the party struggled was in working-class areas . ") in a construction that bears some resemblance to a pseudo-cleft. Evidence that it's an NP as subject comes from the fact that in subject-auxiliary constructions it inverts with the verb: Was where the party struggled in a working-class area?
- Where the party struggled was in working-class areas .
- ") in a construction that bears some resemblance to a pseudo-cleft.
- Evidence that it's an NP as subject comes from the fact that in subject-auxiliary constructions it inverts with the verb: Was where the party struggled in a working-class area?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Where the party struggled was in working-class areas.
Yes, it's best analysed as a fused relative (meaning "the place where ...") in a construction that bears some resemblance to a pseudo-cleft.
Evidence that it's an NP as subject comes from the fact that in subject-auxiliary constructions it inverts with the verb: Was where the party struggled in a working-cl
0
Related Questions