0
Dipsik Posted 17 years ago
Speech & Pronunciation

Where do I put the stress?

Dear all,

could anyone help me mark the stresses in 'segmental phoneme'?

As for the first part, I suppose it is the second syllable that is stressed (adjective, in the first syllable there's a neutral vowel sound). However, I am not sure where the stress goes in 'phoneme'. It should probably be on the first syllable (it's a noun). However, the words seem to flow naturally when the stress is placed on the second syllable, too.

Thanks for any help

L.
  

Top answer

l 'fo? nim That's how I transcribe it. Note that there is no neutral sound in 'seg'.

  • l 'fo?
  • nim That's how I transcribe it.
  • Note that there is no neutral sound in 'seg'.
  • There is lots of ad hoc nonsense out there on reduced vowels: why there is no neutral sound in 'pos' in posterity, despite it not being stressed?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
s?g?m?n t?l 'fo? ?nim

That's how I transcribe it. Note that there is no neutral sound in 'seg'. There is lots of ad hoc nonsense out there on reduced vowels: why there is no neutral sound in 'pos' in posterity, despite it not being stressed?
0
Do you really think there is no neutral sound in the first syllable of the word 'segmental'? Well, I think there is, as oposed to the word 'segment', the first syllable of which does not contain a reduced vowel (neutral), and the first syllable of which is therefore a stressed one. But hey, I admit this might not be (and most probably isn't) a hard and fast rule.

PS: could you provide a
0
Dipsik,

Check M-W, Jones and Wells dictionaries, see whether 'seg' in segment does have a reduced vowel.

I am not a fan of rule; however, I would like to look for an explanation that accounts many disparate pronunciation phenemona.

Posterity, hostility, costectomy, nostolgia, cosmetic, etc--these contra
0
Well, I did check a dictionary (Macmillan) concerning the words 'segmental' and 'segment' and it does work precisely as I wrote above. Moreover, I asked for an example where, in spite of the vowel being reduced, the syllable IS stressed.
0
The examples I quoted above contradict Macmillan's logic. Seond I don't share the same terminology you do: for instance, to me, being reduced and being stressed are not synonomous.

Lets look at the four possibilities.

1. Stressed, reduced
2. Stressed, unreduced
3. Unstressed, reduced
4. Unstressed, unreduced.

If I can show examples which fit either (1) or (
0
I originally talked about a 'neutral vowel sound', which to the best of my knowledge is only one and occurs where there is an extremely strong reduction. Its symbol is the so-called 'schwa' (an upside down e symbol). This neutral vowel sound cannot be found in stressed syllables - and it does occur in the first syllable of the word 'phoneme' (as a first vowel sound of this word). I do not
0
DipsikI originally talked about a 'neutral vowel sound', which to the best of my knowledge is only one and occurs where there is an extremely strong reduction. Its symbol is the so-called 'schwa' (an upside down e symbol).
There are actually several schwas. They are not all identical in sound, but dictionaries usually notate these with only one common
0
Re: segmental
DipsikAs for the first part, I suppose it is the second syllable that is stressed
Yes.
Dipsikin the first syllable there's a neutral vowel sound
No. This is another illustration of the fact that an unstressed syllable does not require vowel reduction.

CJ
0
Thank you, Jim, for enlightening me.
CalifJimNo. The first syllable of phoneme does not have a reduced vowel (schwa). The first syllable takes the primary stress and the vowel is full.
Well, I double checked my Macmillan and found out there is a little difference between AmE and BrE. What you said holds true for AmE; in BrE there is a full vowel in th

Related Questions