" is correct English. " are also used. " is not used, as far as I know.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AlpheccaStarsThese are all saying the same thing in anticipation of a sailing event.The sea might be rough here.The sea can be rough here.The sea may be rough here.It is possible that the sea will be rough here.I think licinio means that "the sea can be rough" is talking about possibility at some/any unspecified time, and "the sea may be rough" is talking abo
GPYI think licinio means that "the sea can be rough" is talking about possibility at some/any unspecified time, and "the sea may be rough" is talking about possibility now.That's correct, but he also asked about other modals.
licinioI see. Maybe it's the question form that extends the scope of "can", because I believe the answer would not be with "can", or am I wrong?- Where can it be?- It may/might/could be in the drawer or in the cupboard.Right, "It can be in the cupboard" would not be a natural answer to "Where can it be?" Similarly, "Who can she be?" does not have the answer "
GPY "Who can she be?" does not have the answer "She can be Sarah",In fact, for interest, there is one special situation where this could be a valid answer – when she is pretending to be Sarah or acting as Sarah. For example, some people are trying to decide who will play which characters in a play, and the name of one of the characters is Sarah. This interpre
Justin Frunk "where can it be" Correction "Where could it be?"The reason why I asked is exactly because grammar books say as you have summarised.