0
John Wu Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

When to use participle phrase to replace relative clause?

Hi, everyone.

Relative clauses are used as adjective clauses to modify nouns before them, but sometimes we would take out the subjects of the relative clauses and turn the verbs in participle form, and the participle phrases still function as adjectives, am I right? My question is when I can turn them in participle phrase and when I need to write the whole relative clause.

For example:
there was one thing confusing me.
/there was one thing that confused me

I assume the two sentences above are both grammatically correct.
But Is there any difference between them?
I always confused about which to use when I was practicing writing sentences involving this. Sometimes native speakers would correct my sentences changing my sentences from participle phrases to intact relative clauses, so I am confused about how to choose from the two options.

Thanks for your help!
  

Top answer

/there was one thing that confused me I can't speak for all cases in general, but in this case, your analysis is correct. Welcome to the Forums!

  • /there was one thing that confused me I can't speak for all cases in general, but in this case, your analysis is correct.
  • Welcome to the Forums!
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
John Wuthere was one thing confusing me./there was one thing that confused me
I can't speak for all cases in general, but in this case, your analysis is correct.
Welcome to the Forums!
0
John WuMy question is when I can turn them in participle phrase and when I need to write the whole relative clause.
There is no rule for this. It belongs more in the category of style. My advice is to use the relative clause if you are in doubt.

CJ

Related Questions