When there is no “and” in connecting two clauses.
The challenge we are facing now is to resign the economic system so that it will not destroy its environmental support systems, so that economic progress can continue.
In the sentence above, there is no “and” between two clauses. Is there any reason for this? Grammatically speaking, there should be “and” after “systems,” right? Is there any intended effects?
Top answer
I'm sure you meant to type"redesign" where you have "resign". nicetomeetyou In the sentence above, there is no “and” between two clauses. Is there any reason for this?
- I'm sure you meant to type"redesign" where you have "resign".
- nicetomeetyou In the sentence above, there is no “and” between two clauses.
- Is there any reason for this?
- Grammatically speaking, there should be “and” after “systems,” right?
- Is there any intended effects?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I'm sure you meant to type"redesign" where you have "resign".
nicetomeetyouIn the sentence above, there is no “and” between two clauses. Is there any reason for this? Grammatically speaking, there should be “and” after “systems,” right? Is there any intended effects?
First, they are not independent clauses, so the comma is wrong, and "and" is not need
0nicetomeetyouThe challenge we are facing now is to resign the economic system so that it will not destroy its environmental support systems, so that economic progress can continue.
In the sentence above, there is no “and” between two clauses. Is there any reason for this? Grammatically speaking, there should be “and” after “systems,” right?
Is
0
Related Questions