This is how I see the sentence: You have a subject: The truce You have a verb: started The verb is modified by: disintegrating The adverb, disintegrating, is modified by: last week when Israeli forces entered Gaza to destroy a tunnel dug by militants So the when-clause is adverbial.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousSo the when-clause is adverbial.I agree.
BillJI see these as relative clauses (not adverbials) introduced by the relative word "when". In [1] "when" has "last week" as its antecedent, and in [2], it has "1936" as antecedent. As is typical of when relatives, the antecedent of "when" functions as an adjunct of time within the relative clause.So is it safe to say that whenever "when" follows an express
JungKim So is it safe to say that whenever "when" follows an expression of time, if you will, such as "last week" and "1936", the "when" automatically leads a relative clause that modifies or supplements the expression of time?Yes, as a broad outline, I'd go along with that. Here are some other examples:
JungKimHow about these?(1) And that next step comes after the holidays when the White House sits down with Senate and House leaders to turn two bills into one.(2) You have to come back later when everything is unpacked.What do you think, JungKim?
BillJWhat do you think, JungKim?Theoretically speaking:
JungKimTheoretically speaking:In (1), either "when" modifies "after the holidays" or it leads an adverbial when-clause.In (2), either "when" modifies "later" or it leads an adverbial when-clause Now the problem is that neither "after the holidays" nor "later" can ever be a noun and therefore that the when-clause cannot be a relative clause in either case.Am I right?I don'