spake thusly: [nq:1]What is it? It occured to me today that I was having a moment in which I felt the opposite of a "misanthrope".[/nq] Philanthropist? Altruist? Humanitarian?
[nq:1]spake thusly:[/nq] [nq:2]What is it? It occured to me today that I was having a moment in which I felt the opposite of a "misanthrope".[/nq] [nq:1]Philanthropist?[/nq] That's the one for me. (I gave the question a bit of thought, but gave up since that word refused to come to mind.) Strictly speaking, should the antonym not be "philanthrope"?
[nq:1]On 03 Jun 2005, the Omrud wrote[/nq] [nq:2]spake thusly: Philanthropist?[/nq] [nq:1]That's the one for me. (I gave the question a bit of thought, but gave up since that word refused to come to mind.) Strictly speaking, should the antonym not be "philanthrope"?[/nq] That's not a word which would ever spring to mind; philanthropist seems more natural.
[nq:2]On 03 Jun 2005, the Omrud wrote That's the one ... to mind.) Strictly speaking, should the antonym not be "philanthrope"?[/nq] [nq:1]That's not a word which would ever spring to mind; philanthropist seems more natural.[/nq] Oh, no question: it does indeed which is why I qualified it with "strictly speaking". (But an "ist" tends to describe "one who practices" rather than "one who
Harvey Van Sickle filted: [nq:1](But an "ist" tends to describe "one who practices" rather than "one who is", doncha' think?)[/nq] So an "organist" is someone who practices "organism"?...r