Well, "on" suggests that the hitter has hitted the poor guy from above whereas the second sentence includes the meaning of the first one and includes all the other directions the punch ( or whatever ) could have come from. ( Oh my ***, this sentence is grammaticaly seen a complete disaster )
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
the hitter has hitted the poor guyOops! The verb hit is invariable! (There is no form *hitted.)
Case AssignerWell, "on" suggests that the hitter has hitted the poor guy from above whereas the second sentence includes the meaning of the first one and includes all the other directions...Umm, is it really so? If I grab a baseball bat and hit you on the head, have I to hit you from above? Maybe I'm confusing it with "hit someone in