0
EstherKim Posted 12 years ago
Vocabulary

What's the difference between abundant and replete?

Hi, I want to know about the different meaning and connotation about abundant and replete.
I'm now translating a poem and I have to translate a sentence
which is like,
Every branch is full of seeds

And I've changed it to Every branch abounds with seeds
Or Every branch is abundant/replete in/with seeds.

I don't know the exact difference between these two sentences.

English speakers, please help me!
Your answer will be a lot of help for non-native like me Emotion: big smile
  

Top answer

It is the seeds that are abundant, not the branches. The standard expression is "replete with", not "in". Compared to "abounds with", "replete with" has a stronger nuance of "full".

  • It is the seeds that are abundant, not the branches.
  • The standard expression is "replete with", not "in".
  • Compared to "abounds with", "replete with" has a stronger nuance of "full".
  • "abounds with" has a literary or slightly old-fashioned feel, and is not much used in ordinary modern English.
  • However, it could work in a poem.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
It is the seeds that are abundant, not the branches. The standard expression is "replete with", not "in". Compared to "abounds with", "replete with" has a stronger nuance of "full". "abounds with" has a literary or slightly old-fashioned feel, and is not much used in ordinary modern English. However, it could work in a poem.
0
Thank you so much for your help GPY !
Yeah, I have to change the subject from the branches to seeds to use "abundant."
Before looking at your comment, I was kind of worried if connotation of "replete" is related with food, like being full..
But your comment told me the difference between the words. Thank you!

Related Questions