I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph:
"Hi Tony. I am a reporter for Florida Trend who is working on a profile of Orlando lawyer John Morgan. I came across your post about his advertising while doing some background research. I was just curious if you were in a business effected by these lawsuits, had personal dealings with Mr. Morgan, or if you're a lawyer yourself. I'm in the process of interviewing as many people as I can about John Morgan." Simple typo, or they really don't know the difference between "affected" and "effected" any more?
Top answer
[nq:1]I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph: "Hi Tony. I am a reporter for Florida Trend who is ... [/nq] The latter, I think.
— Usenet
[nq:1]I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph: "Hi Tony.
I am a reporter for Florida Trend who is ...
[/nq] The latter, I think.
You should see some of the stuff written by our local paper's reporters.
It's sad, really.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph: "Hi Tony. I am a reporter for Florida Trend who is ... I can about John Morgan." Simple typo, or they really don't know the difference between "affected" and "effected" any more?[/nq] The latter, I think. You should see some of the stuff written by our local paper's reporters. It's sad, really.
[nq:1]I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph: "Hi Tony. I am a reporter for Florida Trend who is ... I can about John Morgan." Simple typo, or they really don't know the difference between "affected" and "effected" any more?[/nq] Maybe they think that you're in a business that sprung up as a result of the lawsuits. It happens.
[nq:2]Simple typo, or they really don't know the difference between "affected" and "effected" any more?[/nq] [nq:1]Any more? They never did.[/nq] Most, but not all writers would use "anymore" in that context.
(Should I have put a comma after "all"?)
Skitt (in Hayward, California) www.geocities.com/opus731/
[nq:2]I received an e-mail today with the following paragraph: "Hi ... don't know the difference between "affected" and "effected" any more?[/nq] [nq:1]The latter, I think. You should see some of the stuff written by our local paper's reporters. It's sad, really.[/nq] All of ours now say "impacted". I guess it gets them off having to think about it.
[nq:2]The latter, I think. You should see some of the stuff written by our local paper's reporters. It's sad, really.[/nq] [nq:1]All of ours now say "impacted". I guess it gets them off having to think about it.[/nq] All that dental wisdom!
> Hmmm, problematic. I first want to move "Most" and "writers" together Most writers, but not all, would use "anymore" in that context. which is still a bit frayed. What I like best so far is Most writers, but not all writers, would use "anymore" in that context.
Richard Maurer To reply, remove half Sunnyvale, California of a homonym of a synonym for also.