0
Vts nair Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

What is the mean difference between "is + past participle & has been +past participle"?

i am so confused with the use of these two tenses(passive).pls let me know the exact meaning of these two sentence? Ex; my arm have been fractured & my arm is fractured.
  

Top answer

You need "has" in your sentence. My arm has been fractured. (I've broken my arm and it's still broken now) My arm is fractured.

  • You need "has" in your sentence.
  • My arm has been fractured.
  • (I've broken my arm and it's still broken now) My arm is fractured.
  • (=my arm is now in a state of being broken ) To me, there's hardly any difference in meaning between the two sentences.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
You need "has" in your sentence.

My arm has been fractured. (I've broken my arm and it's still broken now)

My arm is fractured. (=my arm is now in a state of being broken )

To me, there's hardly any difference in meaning between the two sentences.
0
my arm have been fractured & my arm is fractured.

In the second one, "fractured" is an adjective. It just tells something about the condition of your arm. My arm is swollen/sore/******/etc.

In the first one, "fractured" is a verb. It tells what happened to your arm.
You could use simple past tense: My arm

Related Questions