"I studied English for 3 years . "? "I studied English for 3 years .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
"I studied English for 3 years.""I have studied English for 3 years."?"I studied English for 3 years." = no longer studying
lucas21cI studied English for 3 years.There is a time gap between the three-year period and the present moment.
lucas21cI have studied English for 3 years.There is no time gap.
lucas21cThen, what is the difference between "I studied English for 3 years" and "I had studied English for 3 years"?I studied English for three years in the past.
geoyoCould it be that I have/had studied doesn't make sense on its own and you have to make an addition to it?Did you read my last post?
geoyoI had studied English for 3 yearsThat's fine, if a later past time is known about. It doesn't necessarily have to appear in the same sentence as the past perfect.
geoyoWhat did you do last year?I had studied EnglishOr this:I moved to England. Then, I had studied English for three years. After that, I moved back home. Am I right that these are bad examples for using the variant with "I had studied" and one should use "I studied" instead?Yes, they are bad examples."I had studied English" is not correct. "I studied Engl