What differences do the two sentences imply?
1) One does not have to "have committed" a crime, the attempt is enough.
2) One does not have to commit a crime, the attempt is enough.
1) One does not have to "have committed" a crime, the attempt is enough. 2) One does not have to commit a crime, the attempt is enough. There is no difference in implication.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
sohel sorwarWhat differences do the two sentences imply?1) One does not have to "have committed" a crime, the attempt is enough. 2) One does not have to commit a crime, the attempt is enough.
There is no difference in implication.
sohel sorwar1) One does not have to have committed a crime; the attempt is enough.
The situation imagined is that of a crime that has already been committed.
sohel sorwar2) One does not have to commit a crime; the attempt is enough.