1 When I gave him 10 dollars, he told me the news. (First, I gave ten $, second, he told the news)
2 When I gave him 10 dollars, he had told me the news. (First, he told the news , second, I gave ten $ )
1 and 2 are clear. Now. The problem.
3 When I met him, he knew the news. (THIS IS NOT CLEAR.)
Is it: a) I met him first and then he learnt the news. OR b) Before I met him he had already known the news
4 When I met him, he had known the news. (Before I met him he had already known the news) CLEAR
5 When I met him he didn't know the news.
Is it: a) I met him first and then he got the news erased from his memory. OR b) Before I met him he had already not known the news
3 and 5 are problematic. How would you interpret them?
Ticce 1 When I gave him 10 dollars, he told me the news. (First, I gave ten $, second, he told the news) The sequence is correct, but the meaning is not what you think. It means that he only told you the news because you gave him 10 dollars.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Ticce1 When I gave him 10 dollars, he told me the news. (First, I gave ten $, second, he told the news)
The sequence is correct, but the meaning is not what you think. It means that he only told you the news because you gave him 10 dollars.
Ticce2 When I gave him 10 dollars, he had told me the news. (First, he told the news , sec