0
Vts nair Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

What had to be concerned about was his treasure

Would anybody help to learn the difference between aforesaid sentence and what had concerned about was his treasure?
Thanks
  

Top answer

Neither of them is correct. What he had to be concerned about was his treasure. What he was concerned about was his treasure.

  • Neither of them is correct.
  • What he had to be concerned about was his treasure.
  • What he was concerned about was his treasure.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
Neither of them is correct.

What he had to be concerned about was his treasure.
What he was concerned about was his treasure.
0
What had to be concerned about was his treasure
What had concerned about was his treasure

Neither one of those is a sentence, VTS. These are sentences:

What he had to be concerned about was his treasure.
What he was concerned about was his treasure.
What he had concern about was his treasure.
0
We seem to be concerned about the same thing, 5jj.
0
I am sorry..that was a typo.

below are the real questions?? does all these almost same meaning?

What he had to be concerned about was his treasure.

What he had concern about was his treasure.
What he was concerned about was his treasure.
I
would appreciate all your reply.
0
vts nairWhat he had concern about was his treasure.What he was concerned about was his treasure.
Those two mean the same: he was worried about his treasure.
vts nairWhat he had to be concerned about was his treasure.
That one is a little different: he should worry about his treasure.
0
still confused and stuck with had to be concerned.would anybody pls rephrase this'what he had to be concerned was about his treasure'then maybe I could understand it very well.

Thanks
0
What he had to be concerned about was his treasure.

This can be read two ways, actually:

His concern was his treasure.
He must be concerned with his treasure.

Hopefully, it would not be ambiguous in context.

Related Questions