) does not refer to an "unreal" situation. It seems so, and I can't think why Mr. Swan is taking this approach.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
JungKimSwan implies that the first example sentence (It would be best if we started early.) does not refer to an "unreal" situation.It seems so, and I can't think why Mr. Swan is taking this approach. I think he is conceptualizing this in a way that is not at all helpful. It seems to me that it's not a matter of "real" vs "unreal", but of "unconditional" an
CalifJimEdit: I could have sworn there was at least one other reply on this thread when I started writing mine, maybe more. I can't find any other replies now. What happened?Actually, I was going to read another answer but I couldn't. It seems to have been deleted.
JungKimActually, I was going to read another answer but I couldn't. It seems to have been deleted.I deleted my answer because I became unsure about the definitions being used.
GPYI deleted my answer because I became unsure about the definitions being used.Thanks for answering and sharing your thoughts, GPY.
JungKimI'm not entirely sure that "if I had any money..." is contrary to fact.I'm not either. According to the grammar books, as far as I know, the only examples where 'if' is followed by a proposition that is false (contrary to fact) are those with the pattern if + past perfect.
JungKimWhat exactly is an unreal situation?To get back to your original question, most of the literature on the subject says, in effect, that "unreal" is like "imagined" or "envisioned", so it's usually associated with the idea of a hypothesis, a guess. Another way to look at it is that "unreal" is "not real", and the usual examples of "real" involve relatio
CalifJimAccording to the grammar books, as far as I know, the only examples where 'if' is followed by a proposition that is false (contrary to fact) are those with the pattern if + past perfect.Could you name some grammar books that say this?
JungKimCould you name some grammar books that say this?No, not by names. And they won't say that literally. I've read so many grammar books in my life I wouldn't know which ones said what. But that doesn't matter because you can go on-line and look up this information yourself. Look under "conditionals". Many websites cover this information, and if they
JungKimBut I'm not entirely sure that "if I had any money..." is contrary to fact.Apologies for not having read all of the posts above, but I feel very confident that, in the example given, "if I had any money" is intended to be counter-factual. If I had any money I'd buy you a drink, but I don't have any money, so I won't/can't buy you a drink.
GPYApologies for not having read all of the posts above, but I feel very confident that, in the example given, "if I had any money" is intended to be counter-factual. If I had any money I'd buy you a drink, but I don't have any money, so I won't/can't buy you a drink.GPY, thanks for following up on this.