What does "not the least of which" mean?

[nq:1]"These and many many more advantages not the least of which are based on lessons learned from ...". Can anyone please explain it to me? Thanks[/nq]
You'll need to provide the entire sentence to get
the full Deluxe AUE Special interpretation, which
comes with our full limited warranty.
If you want the el-cheapo quickie, "not the
least of which" is a fixed phrase meaning

[nq:1]If you want the el-cheapo quickie, "not the least of which" is a fixed phrase meaning something like "one of the more important of them being".[/nq]
I forgot to mention, Mr or Ms b83503104:
this week we have a special on explanations
of "litotes". Would you like to upgrade?

Michael West

[nq:2]If you want the el-cheapo quickie, "not the least of ... something like "one of the more important of them being".[/nq]
[nq:1]I forgot to mention, Mr or Ms b83503104: this week we have a special on explanations of "litotes". Would you like to upgrade?[/nq]
Thank you, sir, but my litote is not unfunctional, and I'm not unhappy with it. It's not the least of my rhetorical devices.

[nq:2]I forgot to mention, Mr or Ms b83503104: this week we have a special on explanations of "litotes". Would you like to upgrade?[/nq]
[nq:1]Thank you, sir, but my litote is not unfunctional, and I'm not unhappy with it. It's not the least of my rhetorical devices.[/nq]
You sure? It's not at all a bad deal. And one litote is not too many to have, you know.

Michael West

[nq:2]Thank you, sir, but my litote is not unfunctional, and I'm not unhappy with it. It's not the least of my rhetorical devices.[/nq]
[nq:1]You sure? It's not at all a bad deal. And one litote is not too many to have, you know. [/nq]
It's not a bad idea to correct a mistake by over-emphasizing it, like you did with "litote," a non-word. Is there a rhetorical device for this kind of irony

[nq:1]It's not a bad idea to correct a mistake by over-emphasizing it, like youdid with "litote," a non-word. Is there a rhetorical device for this kind of irony?[/nq]
I took it as a not unintentional jest. Liebs knows his rhetorical devices without my help.

Michael West

[nq:2]I forgot to mention, Mr or Ms b83503104: this week we have a special on explanations of "litotes". Would you like to upgrade?[/nq]
[nq:1]Thank you, sir, but my litote is not unfunctional, and I'm not unhappy with it.[/nq]
And I'm sure that phraseology is intentional. As is all of yours in this thread.
[nq:1]It's not the least of my rhetorical devices.[/nq]
If you don't mind r

[nq:2]"These and many many more advantages not the least of ... from ...". Can anyone please explain it to me? Thanks[/nq]
[nq:1]You'll need to provide the entire sentence to get the full Deluxe AUE Special interpretation, which comes with our full ... you might kill someone", "not the least of which" means "one of the more important of which," referring to "reasons".[/nq]
Maybe it is beca

[nq:1]If you don't mind refreshing my memory, are you in the regular employ of rhetorical devices for monetary gain, or ... be understandable in my attempt to fit into the spirit of the thread do you practice in the courtroom?)[/nq]
I think Bob practises in aue. In the courtroom, it is the real thing.

Redwine
Hamburg
(previously: Berlin, Northants, Derbs, Staffs, NSW, Tasmania

[nq:2]You'll need to provide the entire sentence to get the ... "one of the more important of which," referring to "reasons".[/nq]
[nq:1]Maybe it is because I am a mathematician, or maybe just because I am a pedant, but I usually take ... the original quote, the lessons learned could be the second least advantage with maybe only one other advantage below it.[/nq]
I think this is a grand op