0
Palinkasocsi Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

What does it mean?

0Does anyone understand the following sentence? I just want to have a general understanding, to understand the basic logic of the sentence.02br
02br
01i00Further, as attested by the occurrence of a number of theory-non-conforming instances of ironic speech, most purely pragmatic views of conversational irony have a limited sphere of explanatory sway.02i02br
02br
01i02i02br
02br
00Any alternative wording?02br
02br
02br
00Many thanks!00 0-
  

Top answer

0Experience shows that people who use sarcasm to get their point across aren't very persuasive. ]0-

  • 0Experience shows that people who use sarcasm to get their point across aren't very persuasive.
  • ]0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

12 Answers
0
0Experience shows that people who use sarcasm to get their point across aren't very persuasive. [Frankly, that's only a wild guess!]0-
0
0Hi, Philip, 02br
02br
00What I wanted to say (because it was me actually who composed this sentence) is:02br
02br
01b00most theories have a limited sphere of explanatory sway because each has to face ironic sentences that they cannot explain02b02br
02br
00Do you think my original sentence is vague for this meaning?02b
0
1i00Further, as attested by the occurrence of a number of theory-non-conforming instances of ironic speech, most purely pragmatic views of conversational irony have a limited sphere of explanatory sway.02i02br
02br
00I understand this to mean, more-or-less: "Most purely pragmatic explanations of how irony is used in conversation have limited use. This is eviden
0
0Test message. Please ignore.0-
0
0It's elegant - hard to ignore.0-
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Palinkasocsi12cite11b10most theories have a limited sphere of explanatory sway because each has to face ironic sentences that they cannot explain12b12br
12br
10Do you think my original sentence is vague for this meaning?12br
12blockquote
10 Yes. I think you need some
0
0"instances of ironic speech"02br
02br
00"conversational irony" 02br
02br
00My problem in trying to make sense of this is that I've never thought of a sentence (or even a statement or an expression) as being ironic. I think of 01b01i01u00situations02u02i02b00 as ironic. (It may fall to people to point o
0
0Hey, A., why don't you check out these links?02br
02br
01a05000 02a02br
02br
01a05100 02a02br
02br
00Sarcasm is a sub-set.0230hrefhttp://www.k-state.edu/english/baker/english320/c
0
0Thanks, GG. It may be hard to believe, but this is news to me. I'd call these examples pure sarcasm, having nothing to do with irony. I readily admit that irony exists (as a situation) in language, and is a handy tool for sarcasm.02br
02br
00I thank the comic strips (funny papers) for some of my early education. My first exposure to the word:02br
02br
0
0
0Dear Mr. Wordy,02br
02br
00Don't worry, I understand your 01i00pragmatic-theory 02i00problem since (and correct me if I'm wrong) you are not supposed to be a linguist. In everyday language 01i00pragmatic02i00 and 01i00theoretical 02i00are kind of opposites, 01i00pragmatic 02i00having

Related Questions