No idea. Again, the sentence is so badly written it's hard to make sense of it, although it appears to be an attempt to create a standard 'faulty goods' terms and conditions, but then it's peculiar to include loss or theft in that. ) A supplier isn't normally required to give you a replacement just because you lose something!
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.