0
Anonymous Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

What do you make of this sentence?

This is a more advanced grammar question. Please tell me what the technical meaning is:

It is claimed that this radio advertising was for the benefit of Miss Jean Tennyson, one of the singers on the program, who in private life is Mrs. Camille Dreyfus, the wife of the president of the company and one of its directors.

I am interested in the last part of the sentence. Grammatically, does this sentence mean that Dreyfus is both the wife and a director? The intended meaning is that the president is also one of the directors, but I am interested as to whether the sentence actually means this.

Thanks!
Tim
  

Top answer

Hi, Well, I read it to mean that Jean is 1 Mrs. Dreyfus, 2 the president's wife 3 a director. In other words, I see this as a list of 3 things.

  • Hi, Well, I read it to mean that Jean is 1 Mrs.
  • Dreyfus, 2 the president's wife 3 a director.
  • In other words, I see this as a list of 3 things.
  • I can see how the other interpretation might be possible, but it would seem to me like a very awkward way to write the sentence if such were the intended meaning.
  • Best wishes, Clive
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Hi,

Well, I read it to mean that Jean is 1 Mrs. Dreyfus, 2 the president's wife 3 a director. In other words, I see this as a list of 3 things.

I can see how the other interpretation might be possible, but it would seem to me like a very awkward way to write the sentence if such were the intended meaning.

Best wishes, Clive
0

No, Mrs. Dreyfus was both Mr. Dreyfus' wife, and a director of the company.

0

Greetings from the future, and apologies for the thread necromancy. I found this post while researching the New York court case Bayer v. Beran, 49 N.Y.S.2d 2 (Sup. Ct. 1944). The statement from the original question is a quote from this case.

I agree that the sentence as written implies that Mrs. Dreyfus is a wife and a director. That's the natural way to read the sentence in Engl

0

Mrs. Dreyfus was a director of the company, as was Mr. Dreyfus, of course, so you can read the end of the sentence either way, but I believe as written, it intended to say that Mrs. Dreyfus was both married to the president of American Celanese, and was a director of that company.

Related Questions