What band i have with this essay

Ielts writing task 2.

Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical object and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion ?

In the world today, using computers to see art and historical products in normal life has gained popularity. Many people believe the role of public museums and art galleries will become unnecessary.

I certainly disagree with this statement. There are two reasons why people should come to museums to see the beauty of artworks. Firstly, it is hard to know about the artistic value when we zoom in it from the computer screen. It is easy to see that artworks and historical objects would be more beautiful when we look it in real life. We, moreover, have more information about works from museums guide, such as cost and age of artworks, we would know more values of pictures or statues. Secondly, it is obvious that we have no pictures of works to post it to network or social media since it has no museums or galleries to display artworks. Artworks need to protect to keep the value and beauty of it. These artworks would break and disappear immediately if there has no place for great achievements in the past.

However, due to the developed of technology. It is not difficult that find historical objects and works of art on the internet just by computer or smartphone. It is convenient for people who do not have historical objects and works of art passion, whereas the human who addicted to artworks would come to museums or galleries to observe the value of artworks and they want to know more information about these achievements.

In conclusion, all the opinions mentioned above make sense. However, I side with the mentioned that public museums and art galleries would be needed in whole life to keep the value of historical artworks