The former. You can think of it as ... the thing(s) that ...
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fivejedjonThe former. You can think of it as ... the thing(s) that ... .Thank you for the reply.
AnonymousIs "what" introducing fused relative construction or an indirect question in the above sentence?I don't see any conflict with its being both. The verb 'say' can take an indirect question, and when that indirect question starts with 'what', it's going to take the form of a fused relative construction.
CalifJimI don't see any conflict with its being both.Thank you for the reply.
CalifJim. Suppose someone has arranged to go shopping. What he has arranged to do is to go shopping. But we don't say "We say to go shopping".No, but we can say 'The thing that he has arranged to fd is (to) go shopping'.