0
Whatchadoin Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Were/had been

We would've passed the test if you'd been a good dancer.
We would've passed the test if you were a good dancer.

She's not a good dancer. That's a general fact. Therefore, the second sentence is better in my opinion. Would I sound like a non-native English speaker if I used the first one? Thanks.
  

Top answer

Hi, whatchadoin She's not a good dancer. That's a general fact. ) You're speaking of a hypothetical situation, hence "Conditional II".

  • Hi, whatchadoin She's not a good dancer.
  • That's a general fact.
  • ) You're speaking of a hypothetical situation, hence "Conditional II".
  • Regards
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Hi,
whatchadoinShe's not a good dancer. That's a general fact.
Then simply say:

We would pass the test if you were a good dancer (= but you are not a good dancer.)

You're speaking of a hypothetical situation, hence "Conditional II".

Regards
0
I'm talking about a hypothetical situation in the past.

That sentence can also imply the present, can't it? The context would tells us.
0
whatchadoinI'm talking about a hypothetical situation in the past.
That sentence can also imply the present, can't it?
Yes. Use your second sentence then.

We would've passed the test if you were a good teacher.


The first one implies that your teacher isn't necessarily always bad. That's not the case: She's generally a bad teac

Related Questions