I am reading a novel, and here is a line says," If he were to tire of the Andalusian fields, he could sell his sheep and go to sea." I am not familiar with "were to" usage. Can anybody help me?
I know If conditional like "If i were you, I would tell the truth." But I am not sure about "If I were to tire of..."
Does it mean "IF he were going to tire of the Andalusian fields, he could..."?
Thanks
Top answer
Yes, but I don't like your version with 'going to'. I would paraphrase it as 'if he tired , he could'.
— Mister Micawber
Yes, but I don't like your version with 'going to'.
I would paraphrase it as 'if he tired , he could'.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The reason i said "going to" because I thought it is in a past continous tense just like the one in present continous tense. When we say," HE is to go somewhere" which means "he is going to go somewhere", right?
No, they are different future forms. 'He is to go' is an expression of future factuality, often because of a command or command-like commitment. 'He is going to go' is an expression of his plan.