0
New2grammar Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

were to break

*71*1p

00The increased drainage pushed the Jianjiang River out of its banks, but officials hoped minor flooding now would prevent a catastrophic flood later on, if the dam were to collapse.02p

01p

00An unknown number of people were evacuated in Jiangyou City ahead of the increased outflow, Xinhua reported.02p

01p

00If the dam 01b00were to02b00 break, it could threaten up to 1.3 million people downstream. More than 250,000 people already have been been evacuated, Xinhua reported.02p

01p

00Is the future meaning introduced by "were to" necessary? Would it be bettter to use the simple past "If the dam broke"?02p

01p

00Thanks02p

00 0-
  

Top answer

0It's hypothetical. The writer doesn't think the dam will break. 0-

  • 0It's hypothetical.
  • The writer doesn't think the dam will break.
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
0It's hypothetical. The writer doesn't think the dam will break. 0-
0
0I agree. Can I use my version of hypothetical statement?0-
0
1blockquote
01cite10New2grammar12cite12br
10The increased drainage pushed the Jianjiang River out of its banks, but officials hoped minor flooding now would prevent a catastrophic flood later on, if the dam 11b10were12b10 to collapse.12br
12br
10An unknown number of people were evacuated in Jiangyou City a
0
0No. Your version suggests that the dam willl probably break. (Really? My version is a typical type 2 conditional)02br
02br
00'Were' is used in the first sentence. Therefore you have to use 'were' in the other sentence. (I should have said that I'll change both for consistency)0-
0
0No. Your version, as I said earlier, will mean the writer thinks the dam will probably break. 0-

Related Questions