0
DirtyGame Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Were

"It doesn't change the fact that the numbers were fudged, or, at best, were misleading"
Is there a need for the second "were"(the one before "misleading")?
  

Top answer

DirtyGame Is there a need for the second "were"(the one before "misleading")? No, nor for the commas.

— Mister Micawber

  • DirtyGame Is there a need for the second "were"(the one before "misleading")?
  • No, nor for the commas.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
DirtyGameIs there a need for the second "were"(the one before "misleading")?
No, nor for the commas.
0

Related Questions