0
Pokh Posted 15 years ago
Grammar
WENT or WAS
More than five thousand years ago, Chinese scholars accurately described the flow of blood as a continuous circle controlled by the hear t, although the discovery WENT/WAS unnoticed in the West.
Guys,
Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference? If I replace although by but will it put the equal emphasis on both the clause?
Thank you
Guys,
Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference? If I replace although by but will it put the equal emphasis on both the clause?
Thank you
Top answer
Hi, More than five thousand years ago, Chinese scholars accurately described the flow of blood as a continuous circle controlled by the hear t, a lthough the discovery WENT/WAS unnoticed in the West. Guys, Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference? Both are OK.
- Hi, More than five thousand years ago, Chinese scholars accurately described the flow of blood as a continuous circle controlled by the hear t, a lthough the discovery WENT/WAS unnoticed in the West.
- Guys, Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference?
- Both are OK.
- 'Went unnoticed' is more stylish, more literary.
- If I replace although by but will it put the equal emphasis on both the clause?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hi,
More than five thousand years ago, Chinese scholars accurately described the flow of blood as a continuous circle controlled by the hear t, although the discovery WENT/WASunnoticed in the West.
Guys,
Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference? Both are OK. 'Went unnoticed' is more stylish, more literary.
More than five thousand years ago, Chinese scholars accurately described the flow of blood as a continuous circle controlled by the hear t, although the discovery WENT/WASunnoticed in the West.
Guys,
Which one is correct WENT or WAS-any difference? Both are OK. 'Went unnoticed' is more stylish, more literary.
0
Related Questions