Are all these sentences correct: 1-The letter was well written by his secretary. 2-The letter had been well written by his secretary.
3-The letter was written well by his secretary. 4-The letter had been written well by his secretary.
It seems to me that 1 is ambiguous. It could have the same meaning as 3, but 'well' in that sentence could also mean 'indeed'. I don't think 2, 3 and 4 are ambiguous.
Gratefully, Navi.
Top answer
". There's no ambiguity in any of them, as 'well' can't mean 'indeed' - perhaps you can give an example of what you are thinking of d
— Meteorquake
".
There's no ambiguity in any of them, as 'well' can't mean 'indeed' - perhaps you can give an example of what you are thinking of d
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
They are generally fine, except (1) can sound bad at times because of the intrusion of 'well' into 'was written'; this is especially because we would be more likely to say "his secretary's letter was...".
There's no ambiguity in any of them, as 'well' can't mean 'indeed' - perhaps you can give an example of what you are thinking of
It's hard to put my finger on the issues with these sentences, but I'll have a try....
"well repaired" is usually used adjectivally or with was/been, not often with 'got' in the form you are using ('got well repaired');
so we would say: 1 - the computer was repaired very well by.... / the computer got repaired very well by... 2 - the computer was very well repaired by...