2. We announced the release of a CD and of a record.
It looks like #3 and #4 have the same structure. But my book says #3 is not OK because it is impossible to coordinate the of-strings. Even though it says like that, I don't understand.
Top answer
Where are numbers 3 and 4? As for #1 and #2, both sound equally awkward to me, and the semantic structure certainly seems the same.
— Mister Micawber
Where are numbers 3 and 4?
As for #1 and #2, both sound equally awkward to me, and the semantic structure certainly seems the same.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I think the point that your book is making is about ellipsis. Where words repeat themselves in a noun-preposition-noun form then you can usually omit some of them..
- He fought with great courage; he fought with great strength
- He fought with great courage and with great strength
Actually, there is no #3 and #4 but only #1 and #2.
My book(English Syntax And Argumentation -Bas Aarts) says in #1 it is impossible to coordinate the of-strings, whereas this poses no problems in #2. This again suggests that the PPs(prepositional phrases) are constituents in #2, but not in #1.
Ah.. yeah. your explanation is far easier than the point introduced in my book. (The point in that part is complement, but I don't understand with the book's rationale.)
Let me introduce it a little.
++
(33) *[Of a man], he was a giant -. (* means ungrammaticality.)
(34) The company didn't announce the release of the record, but [of the CD] they did (
Apart from this thread, I have wanted to know "most common use for "of""; I can study it in dictionaries but I already had a difficulty to sort it out well.
I think it's good to teach students the common use for of as you explained.
I appreciate your nice answer. It seems like I still have a difficulty for some parts of this post; I'll as