0
Park sang joon Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

We knew [it to be a wind.]

A distant sighing sound occurred, and it grew and grew, nearing us. It was not until it arrived, with a great buffeting gust, that we knew it to be a wind. And cold.
["Knight of Shadows" of The Great Book of Amber by Roger Zelazny]
I have been taught the verb "know" takes a "that" clause as an object, rather than to-infinitive.
So I'd like to know why it is "it to be a wind," not "that it is a wind."
Thank you in advance for your help.
  

Top answer

park sang joon I have been taught the verb "know" takes a "that" clause as an object, rather than to-infinitive. Not necessarily. It can take a to-infinitive but not typically in the above context.

  • park sang joon I have been taught the verb "know" takes a "that" clause as an object, rather than to-infinitive.
  • Not necessarily.
  • It can take a to-infinitive but not typically in the above context.
  • " In such cases, you're describing a past habit/routine or characteristic of someone.
  • I agree with you that "...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
park sang joonI have been taught the verb "know" takes a "that" clause as an object, rather than to-infinitive.
Not necessarily. It can take a to-infinitive but not typically in the above context.
For example, "I've known him to lie occasionally."
In such cases, you're describing a past habit/routine or characteristic of someone.

Related Questions