0
Jackson6612 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
We are talking semantics here with
We are talking semantics here with the depth of the fog. Fog is simply a stratus cloud at or slightly above the surface of the earth. Admitedly, a shallow layer of fog would re-radiate less than a thicker, deeper fog.
I hope the above piece is correct.
I'm having problem with "with". I think one of the definitions 2e and 2f fits here. Could you please confirm this. Thanks.
with:
I hope the above piece is correct.
I'm having problem with "with". I think one of the definitions 2e and 2f fits here. Could you please confirm this. Thanks.
with:
Top answer
Hi, I just see it as 'concerning, about'. So maybe 2c. In fact, 'with' does not seem like a great word to use here.
- Hi, I just see it as 'concerning, about'.
- So maybe 2c.
- In fact, 'with' does not seem like a great word to use here.
- I'd prefer 'concerning' or 'about'.
- Clive
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
Hi,
I just see it as 'concerning, about'. So maybe 2c.
In fact, 'with' does not seem like a great word to use here. I'd prefer 'concerning' or 'about'.
Clive
I just see it as 'concerning, about'. So maybe 2c.
In fact, 'with' does not seem like a great word to use here. I'd prefer 'concerning' or 'about'.
Clive
00
Thanks a lot, Clive.
You are right that 'with' is not the best word to use here.
You are right that 'with' is not the best word to use here.
0
Related Questions