Final paragraph of an article at
http://mobilemediaph.com/projectE/PrintSupplement/ethel 2latesierra.html
"Have you every heard the joke that goes: What's the difference between commitment and involvement? Well, it's the difference between eggs and bacon the chicken is committed but the pig is involved. When it comes to biodiversity conservation and the ecosystem, try as we might to pretend to be good chickens in truth, we are all bacon here."
I get exactly two Google hits for "pig is involved" +"chicken is committed"...517 for the converse, which is the only way that really makes sense...I wouldn't even have thought to try it the other way, except that I was recently reminded of a former boss of mine who said it exactly the way this ecology page does, and was convinced his way was right..
This follows an attempt to find the actual meanings of a common pair of phrases:
"walk the walk" 83,400 hits
"talk the talk" 64,000
"walk the talk" 43,300
"talk the walk" 1,670
Same boss who confused the pig and the chicken felt that "walk the walk" referred to greater "buy-in" and he couldn't be swayed...I do find one site that explains the homogenized forms as follows:
"'Walking the talk' is living up to your words, but you also need to 'Talk the walk' and be clear about the walk you want to take."
Is this more obvious to other people than it is to me?...because I can't see how they derive that meaning from the given words..r