0
Big dream Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

We agreed that the proposal was a good one.

Hi,

We agreed that the proposal was a good one.

Please what is the function of the abive noun clause?

Is it a direct object? But, isn't the verb 'agree' intransitive?

Is it an appositive?

Thanks a lot.
  

Top answer

No, it's not a direct object, or an appositive. It's actually called a content clause, and in your example it functions as complement to the verb "agreed". g.

  • No, it's not a direct object, or an appositive.
  • It's actually called a content clause, and in your example it functions as complement to the verb "agreed".
  • g.
  • "My friend the mayor is attending the function".
  • g.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
No, it's not a direct object, or an appositive. It's actually called a content clause, and in your example it functions as complement to the verb "agreed".

Two points:

(i) appositives are noun phrases, not clauses, e.g. "My friend the mayor is attending the function".
(ii) the verb "agree" can be used transitively, e.g. "They agreed a price for the car".
0
BillJThey agreed a price for the car
Off-topic parenthetical observation. This must be BrE. I've never heard it here (AmE).

CJ
0
BillJNo, it's not a direct object, or an appositive. It's actually called a content clause, and in your example it functions as complement to the verb "agreed".
I don't understand what do you mean by complement of the verb. I know two types of complements: subject comlement and object complement, but, I think neither of them is the function of the clause.
0
CalifJimBillJThey agreed a price for the car Off-topic parenthetical observation. This must be BrE. I've never heard it here (AmE).
What a pointless post, CJ. And that part of my reply not off-topic. The OP asked if the verb "agree" was intransitive, and I gave an example of it being used transitively. A similar example is also cited in the Oxford dictionary
0
big dreamBillJNo, it's not a direct object, or an appositive. It's actually called a content clause, and in your example it functions as complement to the verb "agreed". I don't understand what do you mean by complement of the verb. I know two types of complements: subject comlement and object complement, but, I think neither of them is the function of the clause.
0
BillJWhat a pointless post, CJ.
I see you're your usual cheery self today! Emotion: smile
B
0
I have a pointless remark of my own: as a speaker of AmE, I would certainly say They agreed on a price for the car.
0
Aspara GusI have a pointless remark of my own: as a speaker of AmE, I would certainly say They agreed on a price for the car.
Same here. Merriam-Webster has this entry under 'agree - transitive':

chiefly British : to settle on by common consent : arrange <agreed rental terms with him — Eric Bennett>


CJ
0
CalifJimI didn't say it was, and you would have known that if you were paying attention. You know, not everything anyone says is an attack on you. The "off-topic" remark was mine. You call it pointless; I call it merely off-topic. In any case I believe it's at least somewhat useful for students to hear occasional remarks about the difference between British and American E
0
BillJIf only you had put a colon after the word "observation", CJ, the real meaning of your post would have been clear!
Oof! I really thought I had used the colon there.

Related Questions