0
Zuotengdazuo Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

Was to have been?

Robert had loved her even more. She was to have been his bride.
“She was more beautiful than that,” the king said after a silence. His eyes lingered on Lyanna’s face, as if he could will her back to life.

Hi, dear teachers. I am wondering why the author use the structure "was to have been"? I have only encountered "was to do"(meaning "will do") but not "was to have been"? What does this structure mean?

Thank you.

  

Top answer

" is a correct sentence. It means: there was supposed to be a wedding between Robert and this woman, at some time in the past, but something occurred to prevent the wedding.

  • " is a correct sentence.
  • It means: there was supposed to be a wedding between Robert and this woman, at some time in the past, but something occurred to prevent the wedding.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0

"She was to have been his bride." is a correct sentence. It means: there was supposed to be a wedding between Robert and this woman, at some time in the past, but something occurred to prevent the wedding.

0
zuotengdazuoI am wondering why the author use the structure "was to have been"?

The form be + infinitive shows us that something is/was planned for the future.

Present tense:

The meeting is to be held in Los Angeles next year.  (It is planned in the present, and the time for the event is in the future.  It has a similar me

Related Questions