0
Jigneshbharati Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Was that another bunch

What Max had not bargained for, when the bunch of people moved off at the peep-peep-peeping of the little green man, was that another bunch would be coming towards him from the other side of the street.
https://ibb.co/TM1ZypH
What is the grammatical form and function of "that another bunch...."? Would the sentence be still grammatical without "that" (, was another bunch...)? Does "that" in "was that another..." refer to anything?

  

Top answer

"? Take "it" to mean "what Max had not bargained for", and remove the parenthetical "when" clause, and you get "It was that another bunch …". The "that" clause is a noun clause acting as the predicate nominative of the copulative "was".

  • "?
  • Take "it" to mean "what Max had not bargained for", and remove the parenthetical "when" clause, and you get "It was that another bunch …".
  • The "that" clause is a noun clause acting as the predicate nominative of the copulative "was".
  • )?
  • Yes, barely, but it would not be clear.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
JigneshbharatiWhat is the grammatical form and function of "that another bunch...."?

Take "it" to mean "what Max had not bargained for", and remove the parenthetical "when" clause, and you get "It was that another bunch …". The "that" clause is a noun clause acting as the predicate nominative of the copulative "was". (in old-fashioned grade-school gr

Related Questions