0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage

*was currently*

Dear friends,
Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence:
He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas.
Is the was currently usage justified by the fact that he died only a couple of days ago?
Personally I think it's wrong grammatically. If you also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?
Another question I have is about the leaflet we usually get on the occasion of a funeral service. Is there a noun for the leaflet in English? The leaflet usually contains a photo and a brief biography of the dead, and the venue with the date and time of burial service. Thanks,
Shine.
  

Top answer

[nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ... days ago? Personally I think it's wrong grammatically.

  • [nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ...
  • days ago?
  • Personally I think it's wrong grammatically.
  • [/nq] It sounds wrong to me.
  • " Mike Nitabach
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

16 Answers
0
[nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ... days ago? Personally I think it's wrong grammatically. If you also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
It sounds wrong to me.
"Until his death, he worked at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas."

Mike
0
[nq:2]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this ... also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
[nq:1]It sounds wrong to me. "Until his death, he worked at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas."[/nq]
It sounds like he was working all his life at the SRISA, unless the entire resume of the beloved departed is recited and the above is the last
0
[nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ... of days ago? Personally I think it's wrong grammatically. If you also thinkso, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
"He had been working" might work, though I think Michael N's rewrite is better.
[nq:1]Another question I have is about the
0
[nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ... days ago? Personally I think it's wrong grammatically. If you also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
It is wrong syntactically but not grammatically
(so far as "currently working" implies someone may in future work elsewhere.)
0
[nq:2]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this ... also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
[nq:1]It sounds wrong to me. "Until his death, he worked at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas."[/nq]
At the time of his death he was working ...
He had been working ...

dg
0
[nq:1]We tend to save funeral cards, remembrances, and programs. My maternal grandmother put them in her Bible, and this was/is ... the "Family Tree." I kept the Bible, in which Grandma had also placed a four-leaf clover and other small items.[/nq]
You don't call them "prayer cards"? Any good Catholic has a mirror somewhere in the house with prayer cards stuck in the frame. The older you get,
0
[nq:2]It sounds wrong to me. "Until his death, he worked at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas."[/nq]
[nq:1]At the time of his death he was working ...[/nq]
These suggestions sound to me as if he dropped dead in the workplace. Quite likely "he was employed by" or "was an employee of" would be truer.

Best Donna Richoux
0
Don Phillipson wrote on 05 Sep 2004:
[nq:2]Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He ... also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
[nq:1]It is wrong syntactically[/nq]
Because "syntax" refers to the order of words in a sentence, I have to disagree with this judgment. "Currently" is not in the wrong order; it just doesn't belong there at all.
[nq:1]bu
0
[nq:1]Dear friends, Today I read a eulogy that had this sentence: He was currently working at the Southwest Research Institute ... days ago? Personally I think it's wrong grammatically. If you also think so, can you please rewrite the sentence correctly?[/nq]
This threw me for a minute. Logically, "he was currently" is appalling - the past tense "was" is in direct contradiction to the w
0
[nq:1]Maria Conlon:[/nq]
[nq:2]We tend to save funeral cards, remembrances, and programs. My ... had also placed a four-leaf clover and other small items.[/nq]
[nq:1]You don't call them "prayer cards"? Any good Catholic has amirror somewhere in the house with prayer cards stuck in the frame. The older you get, the less reflective area remains. Sometimes thisis the same mirror where the pal

Related Questions