0
Englishnewbie Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

was a devout admirer of

Hello

He was a devout admirer of democracy.
I am an admirer of your father's.

Which is correct?
Why is "father's" not "father"?

I am an admirer of your father (not your father's)

Thanks.
  

Top answer

"Father's" is an error. Probably a typo. The first sentence is correct but the second lacks a subject.

  • "Father's" is an error.
  • Probably a typo.
  • The first sentence is correct but the second lacks a subject.
  • For example, I'm an admirer of your father's public speaking skills.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
"Father's" is an error. Probably a typo.
The first sentence is correct but the second lacks a subject.
For example, I'm an admirer of your father's public speaking skills.
0
Because it is an instance of the double possessive:
I admire your father
and
I am an admirer of your father's.

He is a friend of mine. (Note that 'mine' is the possessive pronoun.)
Not, 'he is a fan of her', but
He is a fan of hers.
0
Hi,
Basically, I agree with JP. For further details, have a look at this link and read CJ's crystal clear explanation:



Regards
0
You're correct Terry, it is an instance of a double possessive. But as Regards and CJ point out, this is a grey area and one that often causes confusion and may even elevate tempers.

The following is from: http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/double-possessive.aspx

0
Avoid - yes, if one wishes, and I gave the example "I admire your father" as a simple alternative. However, this then omits the sense that the father apparently has a number of/many admirers, of whom I am but one.

But the original question was, why "father's" and not "father" ? The simple answer is, because the author had used the double possessive 'father's'.

You
0
Hi,
This article is indeed useful. Mignon Fogarty (Grammar Girl) definitely knows how to explain things well.

I find her explanations rather fruitful. Thanks.

Regards
0
Hi,
Terryxpress The simple answer is, because the author had used the double possessive 'father's'.
I'm an admirer of your father's is not wrong, but I would avoid using the double possessive here.

I think both CJ and Mignon Fogarty spelled out why in a case like this using the double possessive

is not so common and effective.
0
My head is spinning.

But thanks!

Related Questions