No. it's "I see (that) the house below has moved". You did not see it move/moving.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hans51The reason why have is used in the sentence is see needs bare form verbs as an object complement like I see you dance?No. You can't use a perfect form (have moved) in that position. In the catenative structure, it's only the plain verb or the -ing form.
Hans51Thank you both so much and then could you tell me which one "see" means in the original sentence?The original sentence (I see the house below have moved) is wrong as far as I know, so there isn't much point in discussing it.
CalifJimI see (that) the flag has moved.I saw the flag [move / moving].Thank you so much! This is what I would like to know and then is there a meaning difference between the two different structures?
Hans51is there a meaning difference between the two different structures?OK. Now I understand what you're asking for.