If we pluralize words as words in text, we have the option to italicize them, but not the plural-ending 's.'
Example- There were five ands in his last sentence. In this sentence, I italicized the word 'and,' but not the letter 's' at the end. I believe this is correct.
My question is whether or not you can add an apostrophe to lend clarity.
Example- There were five and 's in his last sentence. This tends to make it look more possessive, but do you prefer the first example above or this one? In this one, I italicized 'and' but not the apostrophe and the 's.'
Thanks for your input.
Top answer
You should not add an apostrophe. An apostrophe is for possession. It is however, hard to read with an italicized and .
— Mister Micawber
You should not add an apostrophe.
An apostrophe is for possession.
It is however, hard to read with an italicized and .
I suggest single quotations: There were five 'and's.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
You should not add an apostrophe. An apostrophe is for possession. It is however, hard to read with an italicized and. I suggest single quotations: There were five 'and's.
Thanks, Mister Micawber. I'm assuming that you'd agree with the sentence below based on your guidance. If not, how'd you write it? I've never seen that style in grammar/punctuation guides, and quite honestly, I love the way you punctuated it.
You good with this below?
There were five 'and's, three 'but's, four 'yes's, six 'hello's, fourteen 'why's, three 'no's, five 'which's,