If I'm not mistaken, the "verbless clause" Teo is making reference to must be the phrase after the comma, i.e. "eager to display my talent". Sometimes, in "verbless constructions" the delition of the verb is marked by the addition of a comma, such as the one before ", eager to display my talent". However, I'm not sure whether we could consider this a clause. I'd rather say it
There you got it Davkett! I think that's Teo's point. When you expand the sentence and uncover its deep structure, you add the verb "to be", which, I suppose, is the one Teo may have been thinking of when he posed his question. It doesn't matter whether the two verbs share the subject or not. Besides, the ellipsis would be of the verb "to be" before "eager to" and doesn't have to do with the phras
What is the grammatical term for the fronted 'clause'? I think this was once discussed here on this forum and I remember there was some controversy over the appellation of it. Some called it an 'adjectival clause,' and others referred to it as an 'adverbial clause.' I personally prefer the former, as the clause describes the