Thus we can conclude that.
Eg. 'I didn't see him playing' is an incomplete statement It's better to say- I didn't see him play.(since there is no object)Eg. I didn't see him play (noun)
makes sense since play is a noun as well as a verb
But I didn't see him decide is wrong because decide is not a noun thus a meaningless sentence.3. For words which are both noun/verb do they also have deverbal noun form? If yes when would that be required if we can simply use the word(noun form) itself when noun is called for?
4. In short the i need to understand the exact rules/conventions of using verbals, de verbals and base noun(when word is both verb and noun).
ThankyouYou are on the wrong track, I'm afraid. I didn't see him play and I didn't see him playing are both possible. I didn't see him decide and I didn't see him deciding are unnatural , but the reason is simply that 'deciding' is not something that we can normally observe.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
You are on the wrong track, I'm afraid.
I didn't see him play and I didn't see him playing are both possible.
I didn't see him decide and I didn't see him deciding are unnatural , but the reason is simply that 'deciding' is not something that we can normally observe.
Alright sir that is very helpful. Will let you know for any other doughts i may have.
one last thing since gerunds/participles can take an object is it correct to say that even though they are working as a noun but they cannot be termed as noun unlike Nominalized noun.
Also you mentioned playing is participle not gerund, but it's not working as an adjective but rather as a noun