Valid findings
Hello, everyone,
“Conflicts between the goals of science and the need to protect the rights and welfare of human research participants result in the central ethical tension of clinical research. The statement “Bad science is bad ethics” is true. Putting humans at risk if the study design does not permit a reasonable expectation of valid findings is never ethical. Even a study that presents no risk presents at least an inconvenience to participants and is in that sense disrespectful.“
How could you paraphrase the underlined part above an easier way, while I understand it means, ‘us to expect that the scientist would present legitimate findings after the study is completed’.
Would appreciate on your valuable opinions.
* source;
https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=oR0tBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=%22Conflicts+between+the+goals+of+science+and+the+need+to+protect+the+rights+and+welfare%22&source=bl&ots=2YUAdOz1yE&sig=ACfU3U2fepdivpXUVIvoSJpzVC3ESAUGXQ&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwis7Jf23-j2AhUvwosBHfWlCXwQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=%22Conflicts%20between%20the%20goals%20of%20science%20and%20the%20need%20to%20protect%20the%20rights%20and%20welfare%22&f=false
Top answer
" A study that is so poorly designed that its findings will be worthless is bad science. To subject people to any imposition in the course of such a study is unethical. You must get the science straight first.
- " A study that is so poorly designed that its findings will be worthless is bad science.
- To subject people to any imposition in the course of such a study is unethical.
- You must get the science straight first.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The writer expanded on the aphorism "Bad science is bad ethics." A study that is so poorly designed that its findings will be worthless is bad science. To subject people to any imposition in the course of such a study is unethical. You must get the science straight first.
0
Related Questions