0
Hammerman1 Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Using past perfect twice in a sentence and the difference between Had not and Did not

Hi,

Could you please tell me what the difference is between had not and did not?

Eg-

My friend told me he had failed because he had not studied.

My friend told me he had failed because he did not study.

Moreover, would the reported speech for the following two sentences be the same-

Friend: I failed because I did not study / I failed because I had not studied.

Reported Speech: He said he had failed because he had not studied.

Is it ok to use past perfect twice in that sentence or any other sentence for that matter? Does it not confuse the reader?

eg-

Friend: I was disappointed that I was not allowed to resubmit my assignment.

Reported Speech: He said he had been disappointed that he had not been allowed to resubmit his assignment.

Can't you just write it in simple past?

Sorry for asking too many questions and thanks.
  

Top answer

hammerman1 I failed because I did not study / I failed because I had not studied. The core meaning is the same. "Didn't" seems to sound more common.

  • hammerman1 I failed because I did not study / I failed because I had not studied.
  • The core meaning is the same.
  • "Didn't" seems to sound more common.
  • hammerman1 Friend: I was disappointed that I was not allowed to resubmit my assignment.
  • Reported Speech: He said he had been disappointed that h e had not been allowed to resubmit his assignment.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
hammerman1I failed because I did not study / I failed because I had not studied.
The core meaning is the same. "Didn't" seems to sound more common.

hammerman1Friend: I was disappointed that I was not allowed to resubmit my assignment.
Reported Speech: He said he had been disappointed

Related Questions