0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Use was or were?

Two days was/where hardly enough time for her to relax

Days is plural so I was wondering if you should use were? Though I hear people say was a lot?

Thanks
  

Top answer

Anonymous Two days was/ w h ere hardly enough time for her to relax -- were Days is plural so I was wondering if you should use were? Though I hear people say was a lot? Thanks If you are thinking of each day as a separate unit, you can use "were" but with "chunks of time" you can use a singular verb for the whole unit of time.

— BarbaraPA

  • Anonymous Two days was/ w h ere hardly enough time for her to relax -- were Days is plural so I was wondering if you should use were?
  • Though I hear people say was a lot?
  • Thanks If you are thinking of each day as a separate unit, you can use "were" but with "chunks of time" you can use a singular verb for the whole unit of time.
  • It's the same with money or distance.
  • Three miles doesn't seem too far to walk, $100 is a low price for this item.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
AnonymousTwo days was/where hardly enough time for her to relax -- were

Days is plural so I was wondering if you should use were? Though I hear people say was a lot?

Thanks


If you are thinking of each day as a separate unit, you can use "were" but with "chunks of time" you can use a singular verb for the whole unit
0
0
"Days" is indeed plural, but in the example that you have given you are referring to a single period of time, so it should be "was" (compare "my inside leg measurement is 30 inches" not "are 30 inches").
Simon Stanley.
0
0
Anonymous (compare "my inside leg measurement is 30 inches" not "are 30 inches")
That's not the same. Verb number follows the speaker's concept of the subject, not the predicate nominative.
0

Related Questions