)
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Aspara Gusfind(The sentence should end with a question mark.)Thanks. But doesn't 'would' take a past tense (found) in conditional sentences?
Anonymous But doesn't 'would' take a past tense (found) in conditional sentences?In second conditionals would expresses modal remoteness, but here it is being used to make a polite request in an open conditional.
Aspara Gus Anonymous But doesn't 'would' take a past tense (found) in conditional sentences?In second conditionals would expresses modal remoteness, but here it is being used to make a polite request in an open conditional.I see. Thanks. So only in requests (that end with question marks) it is not required. Would that be correct?
fivejedjon"Would you please ..." is a polite request. It is not part of a traditional conditional sentence.Thanks. Isn't it part of a traditional conditional sentence even if a polite request contains an 'if'? I thought that the unclusion of 'if' always makes it a conditional.
Aspara Gus Anonymous But doesn't 'would' take a past tense (found) in conditional sentences?In second conditionals would expresses modal remoteness, but here it is being used to make a polite request in an open conditional.Hi AG, I would really appreciate it if you would answer my previous post and clarify the subject.
AnonymousWould you please call me if you find my dog.The present goes in the if-clause if it's introduced by an imperative.
AnonymousWould you please call me if you 'find or found' my dog.If you find my dog, please call me. (This is a zero or open conditional. It is describing a future condition that might happen, and a request to act on it. There is no implication on the probability of the event.)
CalifJimhe present goes in the if-clause if it's introduced by an imperative.Thanks, CJ. I am glad that you responded, as I have been a little confused with this.
CalifJimAll you're doing is adding a few words to make it more polite. That doesn't change the fact that you need the present tense "find".I thought that 'would'