0
Ruolando Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Use of the definite article

Hello guys....yesterday I was leafing through a famous self study guide, and I came across these two sentences, which do not sound completely right to me: a) the famed assmil method keeps its finger on the pulse of media jargon; b) the opposition does not criticize government policies, it slams them. Personally, I would have written them as: c) the famed assmil method keeps its finger on the pulse of the jargon of the media; d) the opposition does not criticize the policies of the governement, it slams them. This is because I would use the definite article in front of "media" and "government". Moreover, I do not think that an extra article in front of "jargon" (likewise, I would say: the english language, the french language...) would be that bad. I am sure that both the sentences a) and b) are correct. I just have the feeling that they do not sound good to my brain, because I still cannot understand the flavour behind the use of the definite article in them.

Thank you very much in advance.
  

Top answer

They sound better without the 'the' because the originals are talking generally. Also "media jargon" is one single idea, whereas "the jargon of the media" separates it into two ideas, as it were. d

  • They sound better without the 'the' because the originals are talking generally.
  • Also "media jargon" is one single idea, whereas "the jargon of the media" separates it into two ideas, as it were.
  • d
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
They sound better without the 'the' because the originals are talking generally.
Also "media jargon" is one single idea, whereas "the jargon of the media" separates it into two ideas, as it were.
d
0
Thank you very much for your kind reply.

Regards,
Federico

Related Questions